There’s this song that’s been ringing in my head
these past few weeks. It’s one
of the new songs from Paramore’s new self-titled album. It talks about how
people are thrust into the real world (or any new situation) and forced to face
the challenges of living independently or simply living a life where they have
to look out for themselves.
Some standout lines from the song’s lyrics go this
way (from AZLyrics.com):
“If it don't
hurt now, then just wait, just wait a while.
You're not the
big fish in the pond no more.
You are what
they're feeding on.
So what are
you gonna do when the world don't orbit around you?
Ain't it fun
living in the real world?
Ain't it good
being all alone?
Where you're
from, you might be the one who's running things.
Well, you can
ring anybody's bell to get what you want.
See it's easy
to ignore trouble when you're living in a bubble.”
The song
resonates with me, especially on the level of a high school teacher, since I
have met (and continue to meet) a good number of students who could very well
be on the receiving end of these lines. These are kids who, whether they do so
willfully or unwittingly (which might be worse), go around feeling entitled,
feeling as if the
world owes them. These are kids who feel they are above the rules. These
are those who feel they are at the center of the universe, and everyone has to
adjust to them and not the other way around. Not all students are like this, of
course. I daresay that most students eventually outgrow this “self-entitlement/self-centered” stage,
but some do persist (even into adulthood I might add).
Eerily enough,
it seems the song is also a good fit for the current issues hounding the Generation
Me version of the UAAP – things like personnel
suspensions, eligibility
rules, and two highly-admired coaches calling it a day (Ricky
Dandan & Leo
Austria). Specifically, though, for the Ateneo fans out there, the lines, “You're
not the big fish in the pond no more/ You are what they're feeding on,” should
resonate even more.
Coach Sandy Arespacochaga piloted Ateneo to a big comeback win over UE. (image by Philip Sison/Fabilioh) |
Before I hack
& slash my feelings about those issues, though, I want to applaud all eight
UAAP teams for playing their hearts out this past weekend. It was, by all
purely basketball-related indications, a great two days of college hoops.
The Maroons
stuck close to the Growling Tigers before getting disemboweled in the fourth
quarter en route to the Dilimanians’ twelfth straight
defeat this season. Sam Marata was the only Maroon in double-figures with
12 points, but he shot just 5/17 from the field. On the other end, the forward
duo of Aljon Mariano and Kevin Ferrer had a field day, combining for 30 points,
19 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 blocks, while shooting 12/20 from the floor.
Looks like these guys are on a mission to reenter the Final Four (who isn’t anyway?).
Karim Abdul rose to the occasin against UP. |
Adamson, too,
fought valiantly, but the Soaring Falcons just couldn’t sustain the pressure
and faltered in
the second half (apparently, that has been their story the entire year)
against the Tamaraws. Don Trollano broke out in a big way – 25 points on 11/19
FG shooting – but other main guys like Ingrid Sewa and Roider Cabrera failed to
put up the big numbers. Instead, Adamson was on the receiving end of a
career-defining scoring performance from Terrence BROmeo, who netted 32 big
ones in 33 minutes (nearly 1-point-per-minute!). He also had 8 ribbies, 4
dimes, and 1 theft for good measure. Another big story was Mac Bello’s
18-point, 9-rebound, output. Looks like FEU has found its new long-limbed star
big man in this kid from Midsayap, Cotabato.
Achie Iñigo tried to match-up well with FEU's RR Garcia. |
The Blue
Eagles also did well despite falling behind early thanks to Roi “Recto
Revolver” Sumang’s first half barrage. Sumang just ran rings and shot over his
Katipunero defenders in the first two periods, helping the Reds erect a
10-point bubble at the break. It was a good thing, though, that Kiefer Ravena
and the Eagles woke up in the second half to salvage the win.
Kief ended up with 22 points to counter Sumang’s own 27-point performance, but
the unheralded difference-makers were Chris Newsome and Ryan Buenafe, who
paired up for 28 points, 19 boards, and 6 assists. This win was Ateneo’s
seventh in twelve outings and still kept them in the race for a possible (but
improbable) twice-to-beat edge. Of course, what
happened a day after is the real talking point (just one more paragraph
before we get to it).
Chris Newsome and the Eagles rallied to beat UE. |
By far the
most impressive team of the second round, however, has been De La Salle. The
Green Archers remained unbeaten in six second round matches after beating the
NU Bulldogs in a tight one, 57-55. Strangely
enough, La Salle’s supposed Achilles’ heel – Jeron Teng’s decision-making and
free throw shooting – saved them in this one. Teng went 4/4 from the line in
the dying minutes and converted the go-ahead basket with about 34 ticks to go.
Slowly, the former Xavier stalwart has matured into a really dangerous clutch
performer, and it sure looks like the Archers are peaking at the right time.
Oh, and they do have a guy named Jason Perkins whom you guys might want to keep
tabs on. Last I checked, the kid could play – 18 points, 10 rebounds, and 3
assists here.
Jeron Teng has developed into a reliable clutch performer. |
And now to the
real meat of the matter – WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON WITH THIS WHOLE “I SAW
COACH BO AT THE MALL OF ASIA ARENA SO ATENEO SHOULD LOSE” HULLABALOO?!
First, there
IS a rule that CLEARLY does state that any suspended team personnel (it is defined
as any member of the team that is NOT an athlete, so it refers to coaches,
managers, medics, masahistas, etc.)
should NOT be in the game venue.
(In the absence of a free-to-share hard copy of any UAAP rulebook,
you may look at the UAAP’s Rules & Regulations on our affiliate site, Inboundpass.com.)
Was coach Bo Perasol suspended? Yes.
Was he in the MOA Arena during Ateneo’s game against UE? Yes, he was
at the dugout during the game and went to the playing area afterwards.
Coach Bo was present. (image by Andrew Pamorada/FullCourtFresh.com) |
Does this, technically, constitute a violation of the
aforementioned rule? I want to think of an eloquent rebuff, but the painful fact
is YES IT DOES. As a person of authority in my school, I try to enlighten
students about the importance of abiding by and respecting rules and
regulations, and my initial stand on this issue is that Ateneo should face the
music. If the win is forfeited, then so be it.
BUT THEN an
article comes out that alleges how coach Bo was allowed by a member of the
UAAP Board to be in the venue. Do the rules & regulations have any
provisions that can shed light on this development? Oops. And who is this
“person who granted permission” anyway? #ThePlotThickens
And then now
the Eagles come out with their own counterpunch statement: How about the other
UAAP personalities suspended throughout the course of the season? Maybe we
should look into their presence in the “immediate vicinity of the bench,” too,
right? (See article on Rick
Olivares’s blog)
Were there, at different points in the season, suspended
players who were seen/recorded present during their respective team’s games? Yes (Charles Mammie),
yes (Lord Casajeros), yes (RR Garcia), and more yeses (Thomas Torres & Ralf
Olivares).
Do these, technically, constitute violations of the rules
& regulations for suspended athletes? Well, UNLESS the UAAP Board has
a very strange interpretation of the clause, “A suspended athlete shall not
be allowed to sit in the bench and its immediate vicinity during the period of
suspension,” then I say YES. Of course, some quarters have said that before
the Board can discuss matters on suspended players’ presence during games,
there should be complaints filed (some even say such complaints have to be
filed within 24 hours of the alleged violation). I have, however, not found any
provision in the rules & regulations that support that (not sure if there
any precedents, though).
So where do
these things leave us UAAP fans and observers?
Well, folks,
this is pretty much the UAAP equivalent of crap hitting the fan (which seems to
be an annual thing like non-working holidays). Should the Board tackle UE’s
“concern” about coach Bo, then I implore the Board to also discuss Ateneo’s
“concerns” about the many suspended players. That is the only fair thing, after
all, right? Whatever the consequences are, I just hope they will be meted out
with, at the very least, no impression of any prejudice (HA! FAT CHANCE!).
In the
unlikely event that both UE and Ateneo “get what they want,” then, well, I
don’t even know where to begin with the possible consequences or sanctions.
Will Ateneo and UE have a rematch? Will UE lose all its “contested” games
(Charles Mammie & Lord Casajeros)? How about DLSU (Thomas Torres) and FEU
(RR Garcia)?
Man, this is
going to be dramatic, which is just par for the course in the UAAP.
Of course,
coming from an Atenean’s perspective, I cannot help but entertain the surreal
(or is it?) idea that maybe all these are part and parcel of a heavily
convoluted series of developments culminating in Ateneo’s six-peat dream
getting derailed.
From being THE
big fish in the pond, to being fed on.
Ain’t it fun?
Thanks to my Grade 6 English teacher, Mrs. Sansan Mallillin-Borja,
for the impromptu blog post title suggestion!
"Turns out that if UAAP rules re suspensions are strictly followed and implemented, Ateneo will take the top spot and NU, DLSU, and UST will all be tied at #2. LOLZ!
Analysis from a friend (and die hard Ateneo fan)
UPDATE AS OF 4:45pm (September 10, 2013):
Here's an interesting hypothetical scenario that appeared on the Facebook wall of Slam Online's Robi Raya:
Here's an interesting hypothetical scenario that appeared on the Facebook wall of Slam Online's Robi Raya:
"Turns out that if UAAP rules re suspensions are strictly followed and implemented, Ateneo will take the top spot and NU, DLSU, and UST will all be tied at #2. LOLZ!
Shared by Martin Gomez, Charles Tiu's friend:
Analysis from a friend (and die hard Ateneo fan)
---
This is taken from a post I read somewhere. I've made a few
revisions to make this neater.
Current standings:
FEU 9-4
NU 9-4
DLSU 9-4
Ateneo 7-5
UST 7-5
UE 5-7
AdU 4-9
UP 0-12
NU 9-4
DLSU 9-4
Ateneo 7-5
UST 7-5
UE 5-7
AdU 4-9
UP 0-12
What's been brought up? What sanctions are possible?
- Ateneo Coach Bo Perasol in venue = Forfeiture of Ateneo win over
UE.
- Olivares seated within vicinity of UE bench = Forfeiture of what could have been a UE win over Ateneo.
- Mammie in venue, in vicinity of UE bench in game versus NU = Forfeiture of what could have been a UE win over NU.
- Thomas Torres seated on and within vicinity of bench during Ateneo-DLSU round 2 game = Forfeiture of DLSU win over Ateneo
- Casajeros in venue in vicinity of UE bench in game versus DLSU = Forfeiture of what could have been a UE win over DLSU
- Olivares seated within vicinity of UE bench = Forfeiture of what could have been a UE win over Ateneo.
- Mammie in venue, in vicinity of UE bench in game versus NU = Forfeiture of what could have been a UE win over NU.
- Thomas Torres seated on and within vicinity of bench during Ateneo-DLSU round 2 game = Forfeiture of DLSU win over Ateneo
- Casajeros in venue in vicinity of UE bench in game versus DLSU = Forfeiture of what could have been a UE win over DLSU
How this should play out if the rulebook is strictly followed and
we aren't treated to the usual UAAP board stupidity:
- Ateneo and UE would both have reason to have a win by the other
forfeited. Net effect is that the violations cancel each other out. Ateneo win
preserved.
- Mammie's presence doesn't matter, since NU won the game. NU win unaffected.
- Torres' presence causes the DLSU win to be forfeited. Ateneo wins.
- Casajeros' presence doesn't matter, since DLSU won. DLSU win preserved.
- Mammie's presence doesn't matter, since NU won the game. NU win unaffected.
- Torres' presence causes the DLSU win to be forfeited. Ateneo wins.
- Casajeros' presence doesn't matter, since DLSU won. DLSU win preserved.
Updated standings:
NU 9-4
Ateneo 8-4
FEU 8-5
DLSU 8-5
UST 7-5
UE 6-6
AdU 4-9
UP 0-12
Ateneo 8-4
FEU 8-5
DLSU 8-5
UST 7-5
UE 6-6
AdU 4-9
UP 0-12
So, let's have it, bitches.
---
Oh wait. It's been brought to my attention that this isn't even
complete.
There was also Anthony Hargrove of FEU in the vicinity of the FEU
game during their match against Adamson, and suspended NU coaching staff member
Vic Ycasiano in the venue in their game versus UST.
That means Adamson gets one more win, FEU one more loss, UST one
more win, NU one more loss.
This means:
Ateneo 8-4
NU 8-5
DLSU 8-5
UST 8-5
FEU 8-6
UE 6-6
AdU 5-8
UP 0-12
NU 8-5
DLSU 8-5
UST 8-5
FEU 8-6
UE 6-6
AdU 5-8
UP 0-12
Now, let's all throw everyone under the bus. Let's have it,
bitches."
It is worth noting that this scenario, though absolutely
intriguing, is highly unlikely, since the UAAP will probably not alter results of games from waaay back in the early second round or first round.
Still, it's an infinitely interesting take on what could have happened had the
UAAP been really strict about these things since the beginning of the season.
Unless otherwise specified, all images are by Jan Dizon/Inboundpass.com.
Tweet
4 Comment
And sadly, UP is still 0-12 no matter what. Hahaha. Cheer dance here we come!
BalasCasejeros was not suspended in the game vs. DLSU. His suspension was downgraded. The ADMU letter mistakenly identified Casajeros when they probably were referring to Olivares. Nagmamadali siguro mag-submit ng letter at mandamay so they did not notice this mistake.
BalasAnd truly the plot thickens...
BalasWhat more to expect? This is the same institution(UAAP) that declared co-champions in UST-UE meaning both schools won the championship series. Maybe now they will declare Ateneo and UE both losers of the game. Hay...
Except there's a 48 hour grace period for protests, so the protests on the presence of the players in games (except that of Olivares) won't count anymore. Plus immediate vicinity of the bench, how does one interpret that? One row behind the bench, two rows? So.... i guess the result is a rematch between UE and ADMU, yey! no more forfeiture of games for the other teams.
Balas